Operating Agreement vs. Franchise Agreement: What Is the Difference?

Coral Springs business representing the relationship between an LLC and a franchise

In simple terms, an operating agreement governs the internal relationship between an LLC and its owners, while a franchise agreement governs the relationship between a franchisor and the business operating under its brand.

An operating agreement answers questions about who owns the LLC, who manages it, how decisions are made, how money is distributed, and what happens when an owner wants to leave.

A franchise agreement answers different questions. It establishes the conditions under which the business can use the franchisor’s trademarks and business system and may address royalties, operating standards, territory, suppliers, training, reporting, renewal, transfer, default, and termination.

A business can be subject to both agreements at the same time. The important question is therefore not which document is more important, but which relationship and legal issue the particular provision addresses.

Understanding that distinction is important before signing either document.


What Is an Operating Agreement?

An operating agreement establishes many of the rules governing a limited liability company and its owners.

Under Florida’s LLC statute, an operating agreement governs relationships among members, relationships between members and the LLC, the rights and duties of managers, the company’s activities and affairs, and the process for amending the agreement. Florida law also permits operating agreements to establish specific consequences when a member or transferee fails to comply with their terms.

An operating agreement may address:

  • Ownership percentages and membership interests
  • Capital contributions
  • Voting rights
  • Management authority
  • Allocation of profits and losses
  • Distributions
  • Member compensation
  • Restrictions on transferring ownership interests
  • Admission of new members
  • Death or incapacity of a member
  • Buyout procedures
  • Dispute resolution
  • Dissolution of the company
  • Procedures for amending the agreement

The operating agreement therefore deals primarily with how the LLC and its owners operate together.

It is also important to distinguish the operating agreement from the LLC’s liability protection. The operating agreement establishes contractual and governance rules. It is not itself what creates the legal distinction between the LLC and its members.


What Does an Operating Agreement Actually Control?

Consider two people who form an LLC to purchase and operate a restaurant.

Their operating agreement might establish that one member owns 60 percent and the other owns 40 percent. It might also determine who manages the company, which decisions require member approval, how profits are distributed, and what happens if one member wants to sell their interest.

Those are internal questions.

The agreement may become particularly important when the owners disagree.

In DiMauro v. Martin, a Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal case involving an LLC created to develop and sell a residence, the parties’ amended operating agreement established obligations involving the property, construction funding, capital contributions, membership interests, and the parties’ responsibilities. Litigation later arose over those obligations. The appellate court rejected the trial court’s conclusion that the operating agreement was unenforceable for lack of mutuality of remedy and consideration, although it ultimately affirmed the denial of specific performance on other grounds.

The practical lesson is that an operating agreement is not merely an administrative document kept in a corporate file. Its provisions can become important evidence of the parties’ rights and obligations when an LLC’s members disagree.


What Is a Franchise Agreement?

A franchise agreement addresses a different relationship.

A franchise agreement is a contract governing the relationship between a franchisor and a franchisee. It generally establishes the conditions under which the franchisee can operate a business associated with the franchisor’s brand and business system.

Federal regulations define a franchise based on three elements: the right to operate under the franchisor’s trademark or other commercial identifier, significant control or assistance concerning the franchisee’s method of operation, and a required payment to the franchisor or an affiliate.

A franchise agreement may address:

  • Use of trademarks and other intellectual property
  • Territory
  • Initial franchise fees
  • Royalties
  • Advertising contributions
  • Required products or suppliers
  • Training
  • Operating standards
  • Reporting requirements
  • Insurance
  • Renewal
  • Transfer of the franchise
  • Defaults and cure periods
  • Termination
  • Post termination obligations
  • Dispute resolution
  • Personal guarantees

A franchise relationship can also involve other documents. The Federal Trade Commission’s Franchise Rule requires covered franchisors to provide prospective franchisees with a Franchise Disclosure Document containing 23 specified categories of information. The FTC states that the FDD generally must be provided at least 14 days before the prospective franchisee is asked to sign a contract or pay money to the franchisor or its affiliate.

For that reason, a prospective franchisee should not evaluate the franchise agreement in isolation.


Operating Agreement vs. Franchise Agreement

The simplest distinction is the relationship each document governs.

Operating AgreementFranchise Agreement
Governs an LLCGoverns a franchise relationship
Primarily concerns the LLC and its members or managersPrimarily concerns the franchisor and franchisee
Establishes internal ownership and governance rulesEstablishes franchise rights and obligations
Addresses voting and management authorityAddresses operation under the franchisor’s brand and system
May establish capital contribution and distribution rulesMay establish fees, royalties and advertising obligations
May restrict transfers of membership interestsMay restrict transfers of the franchise
Addresses internal disputes among ownersAddresses disputes between franchisor and franchisee
May establish buyout and dissolution proceduresMay establish renewal, default and termination procedures

The two documents can therefore apply to the same business without serving the same function.

Business partners operating a franchise in Broward County

Can a Franchise Business Have Both Agreements?


Yes.

This is one of the most important distinctions for a business owner to understand.

Imagine that Maria and David form Sunshine Coffee LLC.

Their operating agreement provides that Maria owns 60 percent of the company and David owns 40 percent. It establishes who manages the LLC, how major decisions are approved, how profits are distributed, and what happens if one member wants to sell an ownership interest.

The LLC then purchases a coffee franchise.

The franchise agreement may require Sunshine Coffee LLC to pay royalties, use the franchisor’s trademarks, follow operating standards, use approved suppliers, maintain insurance, complete required training, and comply with reporting requirements.

The two agreements answer different questions.

If Maria wants to sell her 60 percent ownership interest, the operating agreement may determine what happens inside the LLC.

If the franchisor alleges that Sunshine Coffee LLC violated its brand standards, the franchise agreement may determine the parties’ contractual rights.

A proposed transfer can involve both agreements. The operating agreement may govern the transfer of Maria’s membership interest, while the franchise agreement may require the franchisor’s approval or impose other conditions on the transfer.

The Business May Have More Than Two Important Documents

A franchisee may also have to consider a lease, financing documents, personal guarantees, equipment agreements, development agreements, confidentiality provisions, or other contracts.

The Florida case Rigollet v. Le Macaron Development, LLC illustrates how complicated a franchise relationship can become.

In that case, franchise agreements were accompanied by personal guaranties, a $200,000 loan, and a promissory note. The franchisee’s dispute with the franchisor eventually included claims involving alleged representations about profitability, product quality, and the experience of the franchisor’s personnel. The Florida Second District Court of Appeal reversed dismissal of the franchisee’s counterclaim because the allegations were sufficient to support the claims at the pleading stage.

The court also addressed standing under the Florida Franchise Act. It explained that the person who invested in the franchise has standing under the statute, but the pleadings did not make clear whether the investment had been made by the franchisee entity, the individual, or both.

The same litigation continued into 2025, when the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s ruling in a subsequent appeal.

The practical lesson is important: the legal obligations surrounding a franchise may extend well beyond the basic franchise agreement.


What Happens When a Franchise Relationship Breaks Down?

The terms of a franchise agreement can become particularly important when the relationship between the parties deteriorates.

Case Study: Burger King Franchise Terminations

In Burger King Corp. v. Mason, a long running dispute between Burger King Corporation and a group of franchisees involved development agreements, at least 27 franchise agreements, financing arrangements, leases, supply accounts, royalties, and alleged defaults.

Burger King attempted to terminate all 27 franchises. After extensive litigation and multiple trials, the courts determined that some of the terminations were valid and others were not. In an earlier appeal, the Eleventh Circuit reported that the franchisees ultimately prevailed in nullifying the terminations of 14 franchises, while Burger King successfully defended the termination of 13.

The litigation also addressed what happened after properly terminated franchises continued using Burger King’s trademarks. The court held that continued use of the trademarks after valid termination could constitute trademark infringement.

This case demonstrates why provisions concerning default, termination, renewal, transfer, and trademark use after termination deserve careful attention before a franchise agreement is signed.


Does a Franchise Agreement Give the Franchisor Control Over the Entire Business?

Not necessarily.

Franchise agreements can impose substantial operating requirements while leaving the franchisee as an independently owned business.

In Ferrer v. Jewelry Repair Enterprises, Inc., the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal considered whether a franchisor could be held responsible for an injury caused by the owner of a franchisee.

The franchise agreement required standardization of products and services and contemplated regular support from the franchisor. But the court found that the agreement did not give the franchisor substantial control over the franchisee’s day to day management. The franchisee remained an independently operated entity with authority over hiring and firing employees. The court therefore affirmed summary judgment for the franchisor.

The case illustrates an important point: franchise standards and franchisor control are not necessarily the same thing.

The specific language of the agreement can matter when a dispute later concerns responsibility for the franchisee’s conduct.


What Should You Review in an Operating Agreement?

Before signing an operating agreement, business owners should understand how it addresses situations that could create disagreements later.

Ownership

  • Who owns the LLC, and in what percentages?

Management

  • Who has authority to make ordinary business decisions? Which decisions require approval from other members?

Money

  • How are capital contributions, profits, losses, and distributions handled?

Transfers

  • Can a member sell or transfer an ownership interest freely, or must the other members or the company approve the transaction?

Death or Incapacity

  • What happens if a member dies or becomes unable to participate in the business?

Disputes

  • What happens if the owners disagree about a major business decision?

Exit and Dissolution

  • How can an owner leave the company, and what happens if the LLC ultimately needs to wind down?

Florida law gives operating agreements substantial flexibility, but that flexibility has statutory limits. For example, an operating agreement cannot eliminate certain duties or authorize conduct involving bad faith, willful or intentional misconduct, or knowing violations of law.


What Should You Review in a Franchise Agreement?

A prospective franchisee should approach a franchise agreement differently.

Important provisions may include:

  • Initial franchise fees
  • Continuing royalties
  • Advertising fees
  • Territory
  • Required suppliers
  • Equipment requirements
  • Training
  • Operating standards
  • Reporting requirements
  • Insurance
  • Renewal rights
  • Transfer restrictions
  • Default provisions
  • Cure periods
  • Termination rights
  • Post termination restrictions
  • Personal guarantees
  • Noncompetition provisions
  • Dispute resolution

The Franchise Disclosure Document should also be reviewed alongside the franchise agreement. The FTC advises prospective franchisees to review all 23 numbered items in the FDD and ask for clarification about information they do not understand before investing.


How Florida Law Applies to These Agreements

Florida law treats operating agreements and franchise agreements differently because they govern different relationships.

For LLCs, Florida Statutes section 605.0105 provides that an operating agreement governs relationships among members, between members and the LLC, the rights and duties of managers, the company’s activities and affairs, and procedures for amending the agreement. Florida law gives LLC members substantial flexibility to establish their own internal rules, subject to statutory limitations.

Franchise relationships involve both state and federal requirements. The FTC Franchise Rule requires covered franchisors to provide a Franchise Disclosure Document containing 23 specified categories of information, generally at least 14 days before a prospective franchisee signs the agreement or makes a required payment. Florida law also addresses certain franchise related misrepresentations and provides remedies under section 817.416.

The practical distinction remains simple: the operating agreement governs the LLC’s internal affairs, while the franchise agreement governs the relationship between the franchisor and franchisee. A Florida business operating as a franchise may therefore need to comply with both.


Pay Particular Attention to the Exit Provisions

Business owners often focus on how they will open the business. The documents also need to address what happens when the relationship changes.

An operating agreement may determine what happens when an LLC member wants to leave, dies, becomes incapacitated, or wants to sell an ownership interest.

A franchise agreement may establish what happens when the franchisee wants to sell the franchise, fails to meet contractual requirements, seeks renewal, or faces termination.

These provisions can have substantial practical consequences.

A franchise agreement may also contain obligations that continue after termination, particularly concerning trademarks, confidential information, unpaid amounts, proprietary materials, and other protected aspects of the franchisor’s business system.

The Burger King litigation demonstrates why post termination provisions can matter. After certain franchises were properly terminated, continued use of Burger King’s trademarks became a separate legal issue.

Franchise owner managing a business in Coral Springs Florida

A Word From Stuart G. Reinfeld

“An operating agreement and a franchise agreement may govern the same business, but they answer very different questions. The operating agreement establishes how the owners and the LLC will function together. The franchise agreement establishes the rights and obligations between the business and the franchisor.”


Questions to Ask Before Signing Either Agreement

Before forming an LLC, purchasing a franchise, or doing both, a business owner should be able to answer several basic questions.

Who owns the business?

  • The operating agreement should make the LLC’s ownership structure clear.

Who controls the business?

  • The LLC’s management provisions and the franchise agreement’s operating requirements can address different aspects of control.

Who gets paid, and how?

  • An operating agreement may govern distributions among LLC members, while a franchise agreement may establish royalties and other payments to the franchisor.

What happens if someone wants out?

  • The operating agreement may govern the transfer of an ownership interest, while the franchise agreement may impose additional requirements concerning a transfer of the franchise.

What happens if the relationship breaks down?

  • Default, dispute resolution, buyout, renewal, and termination provisions can become extremely important once the parties disagree.

Are there personal guarantees?

  • An individual owner can sometimes take on obligations separately from those of the business entity. The franchise agreement and related documents should be reviewed carefully to determine whether a personal guarantee is required and what it covers.

Operating Agreements and Franchise Agreements Are Not Substitutes

An operating agreement does not replace a franchise agreement, and a franchise agreement does not replace an LLC’s operating agreement.

They solve different legal and business problems.

For an LLC, the operating agreement helps establish the rules governing ownership, management, decision making, financial arrangements, transfers, disputes, and other internal affairs.

For a franchise, the franchise agreement establishes the contractual relationship with the franchisor and addresses the conditions under which the franchisee may operate under the franchisor’s brand and business system.

A business that uses an LLC to operate a franchise may therefore need to understand both documents and how they interact.


For business owners in Coral Springs, Broward County, and throughout South Florida, reviewing these agreements before signing them can help identify provisions that may affect ownership, management, financial obligations, transfers, disputes, and the future of the business.

If you are forming an LLC, purchasing a franchise, or entering into a business relationship governed by one of these agreements, an attorney can review the documents and explain how their provisions may apply to your particular circumstances.

5 Probate and Estate Planning Myths Florida Families Should Know

Probate-attorneys-in-Coral-Springs

Probate and estate planning are surrounded by assumptions that can cause families to make decisions based on incomplete or outdated information. Having a will does not necessarily eliminate probate. A surviving spouse does not automatically receive every asset. And Florida does not currently impose a state estate tax on people who died after December 31, 2004.

These issues can become particularly complicated when a family owns a Florida homestead, has children from different relationships, uses beneficiary designations, or has created a trust.

Here are five common probate and estate planning myths Florida families should understand.


Myth #1: “If I have a will, my family will not have to go through probate.”

A will determines how certain property should be distributed after death, but having a will does not, by itself, eliminate probate.

In Florida, a will generally must be admitted to probate before it can control the distribution of probate assets. Probate is the court-supervised process used to identify and gather probate assets, address valid debts and claims, and distribute the remaining assets to the appropriate beneficiaries. Florida Courts distinguishes probate assets from property that passes automatically through other forms of ownership or beneficiary arrangements.

The important distinction is between having a will and avoiding probate.

Some assets may pass outside probate because of how they are owned or because a beneficiary has been designated. Examples can include certain jointly owned property, life insurance policies, retirement accounts, payable-on-death accounts, and assets held in a properly funded trust.

A will can still be an important part of an estate plan even when other assets pass outside probate. It can designate a personal representative, identify beneficiaries for probate assets, and address property or circumstances that other arrangements do not cover.

Attorney Perspective — Alan J. Reinfeld

“A revocable trust is not simply a document you sign and put away. It is a way of organizing your property so that someone you trust can manage it if you become unable to do so and carry out your instructions after your death.”

The practical question is therefore not simply whether you have a will. It is how your assets are owned and how the different parts of your estate plan work together.


Why this distinction matters

A family can have a perfectly valid will and still have to open a probate proceeding. Conversely, some property can pass outside probate even when there is no will.

That is why phrases such as “I have a will, so I don’t need probate” can be misleading.


Myth #2: “My spouse automatically gets everything when I die.”

A surviving spouse has significant rights under Florida law, but the outcome is not always as simple as “everything goes to my spouse.”

If someone dies without a valid will, Florida’s intestacy laws determine who receives property that passes through intestacy. The surviving spouse’s share depends on the family’s circumstances, including whether the decedent has descendants and whether those descendants are also descendants of the surviving spouse.

Other factors can matter as well.

How an asset is titled matters

An asset owned jointly with rights of survivorship may pass automatically to the surviving owner rather than through probate. Similarly, an insurance policy or retirement account with a valid beneficiary designation may pass directly to the designated beneficiary.

That means the instructions in a will are not necessarily the only instructions controlling what happens to someone’s property after death.

Florida homestead has special rules

Florida’s homestead protections make this issue particularly important for homeowners.

The Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that constitutional homestead rules can restrict how a person’s homestead may be devised after death. In Estate of Murphy, the court examined whether a surviving spouse or descendant had rights in a Florida homestead despite the language of the decedent’s will.

In another significant case, In re Estate of Finch, the Florida Supreme Court addressed a will that attempted to give a homestead to one person while the decedent was survived by a spouse and descendants. The court recognized that Florida’s constitutional and statutory homestead restrictions can override an attempted devise that does not comply with those rules.

These cases illustrate why Florida homestead should not be treated like an ordinary piece of property.

Florida Supreme Court — Estate of Murphy

“A will speaks as of the time of the death of the testator.”

The point is not that every Florida estate will produce the same result. It is that the circumstances existing at death, rather than assumptions made years earlier, can determine how property passes.


Beneficiary designations can also change the outcome

Life insurance, retirement accounts, investment accounts, and other assets may pass according to beneficiary designations rather than according to a will.

A beneficiary designation that has not been reviewed after a divorce, remarriage, death, or other major family change can therefore create consequences that the person who originally completed the form never intended.

Attorney Perspective — Devin P. Tison

“The best estate plan is one that makes the owner’s intentions clear before the family is forced to interpret them under pressure. A trust can provide that structure, but the document and the ownership of the assets need to work together.”

For these reasons, an estate plan should be reviewed as a whole rather than assuming that a spouse will automatically receive everything.


Myth #3: “Probate means the government takes your property.”

Probate does not mean that the government takes a deceased person’s property.

Probate is a legal process for administering assets that are subject to probate. It can involve identifying assets, determining who is entitled to receive them, addressing creditor claims and expenses, and distributing the remaining property according to the will or, if there is no valid will, Florida’s intestacy laws.

If someone dies without a will, that does not mean the State of Florida automatically becomes the beneficiary.

Florida law establishes which relatives inherit when someone dies intestate. Property does not simply become state property because the deceased person did not leave a will.

Probate can still be complicated

The opposite myth is also worth avoiding: probate is not necessarily insignificant.

Florida recognizes different forms of estate administration, including formal administration and summary administration. There is also a limited procedure for disposition of certain personal property without administration. Which procedure applies depends on the circumstances of the estate.

Probate can involve court filings, creditor procedures, notices, inventories, tax issues, real estate, and disputes between beneficiaries or other interested parties.

The process exists partly because someone needs legal authority to deal with property and obligations after a person’s death.

The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in McKean v. Warburton provides a useful illustration of how apparently simple inheritance questions can become legal disputes. The case concerned the treatment of a Florida homestead and the relationship between specific gifts, residuary beneficiaries, and homestead law.


Florida Supreme Court — McKean v. Warburton

The court explained that a person generally may dispose of property by will “so long as that person’s intent is not contrary to any principle of law or public policy.”

That qualification matters.

A person’s wishes are important, but a will does not operate independently of Florida’s statutes and constitutional protections.

The better question is not whether probate means losing your property. It is whether the assets that make up an estate will require probate and, if they do, what administration process applies.


Myth #4: “Estate planning is only for wealthy people.”

Estate planning is not limited to people with large estates.

An estate plan can address much more than the transfer of substantial wealth. Depending on a person’s circumstances, it may address:

  • Who receives property after death
  • Who manages assets during incapacity
  • Who serves as personal representative
  • Whether a trust is appropriate
  • Beneficiary designations
  • Real estate and other significant property
  • Provisions for children or other dependents
  • Financial and healthcare decision-making
  • The treatment of a family business or other complicated assets

The appropriate plan depends on the person’s family, assets, wishes, and circumstances.

A person with a relatively modest estate may still want to make clear decisions about who should receive property, who should manage the estate, and who should make financial or medical decisions if that person becomes unable to do so.

Estate planning is therefore less about reaching a particular dollar amount and more about making arrangements before someone else has to make decisions under difficult circumstances.


Estate planning also involves incapacity

One reason people use revocable living trusts is that they can provide a structure for managing trust property during the creator’s lifetime and after incapacity.

Florida’s Supreme Court addressed the nature of a revocable trust in Florida National Bank of Palm Beach County v. Genova. The court described the essential feature of a revocable trust as the settlor’s retained ability to revoke the trust and regain control of the trust property.

That case is a useful reminder that a revocable trust is fundamentally about control and management of property, not simply what happens after death.

Estate planning is also not something that should necessarily be created once and then forgotten.

Marriage, divorce, the birth or adoption of a child, the death of a beneficiary, a major change in assets, moving to Florida, or creating a trust can all justify reviewing an existing plan.

Attorney Perspective — Alan J. Reinfeld

“One of the most important parts of creating a trust happens after the document is signed. If an asset is supposed to be managed through the trust, the ownership needs to be properly coordinated with the trust. An unfunded trust may not accomplish what the person who created it expected.”

That principle applies more broadly to estate planning: the documents and the way property is actually owned need to agree with each other.

Florida probate and estate planning documents representing common probate myths

Myth #5: “Florida has an estate tax, so my family will lose part of the inheritance.”

Florida does not currently impose a state estate tax on people who died after December 31, 2004.

The Florida Department of Revenue states that a federal change eliminated Florida’s estate tax for deaths after that date. Beginning July 1, 2023, personal representatives also stopped being required to file the former Florida estate-tax affidavits for estates of people who died after December 31, 2004.

That does not mean estate-tax planning is irrelevant in every situation.

Federal estate tax is different

Federal estate tax is separate from Florida’s state tax system.

For people who die in 2026, the federal basic estate-tax exclusion is $15 million per individual. Whether a particular estate has a federal filing or tax obligation depends on the applicable federal rules and the circumstances of the estate.

For many families, however, the most important estate-planning questions may have little to do with federal estate tax.

The ownership of assets, beneficiary designations, probate, incapacity planning, family circumstances, Florida homestead rules, and the appropriate use of wills or trusts can be much more immediately relevant.

Tax rules can also change, which is another reason older estate-planning articles and documents should not be treated as permanently current.


What These Probate Myths Have in Common

Most probate and estate-planning problems do not come from a single document being completely absent.

They often arise because different parts of an estate plan do not work together.

A person may have a will but outdated beneficiary designations. Someone may establish a trust without properly transferring the intended assets into it. A married couple may own property in a way they have never reviewed. Or a family may assume that Florida’s intestacy rules will produce the result they would have chosen themselves.

The way an asset is titled can determine whether it becomes part of the probate estate. Beneficiary designations can determine who receives other assets. A trust can change the way property is managed and distributed. Florida homestead law can impose restrictions that do not apply to other property.

This is why estate planning is ultimately about more than signing documents.

The documents, ownership of property, beneficiary designations, and the family’s actual circumstances need to be coordinated.


When Should You Review an Estate Plan?

There is no universal schedule that applies to every person, but certain events are obvious reasons to revisit an existing plan.

Consider reviewing your estate plan after:

  • Marriage or divorce
  • The birth or adoption of a child
  • The death of a beneficiary or personal representative
  • A major change in your assets
  • Purchasing or selling significant real estate
  • Moving to Florida from another state
  • Creating or changing a trust
  • Changes to life insurance or retirement beneficiaries
  • A significant change in your family circumstances
  • Changes in tax or estate-planning law

A review does not necessarily mean that every document needs to be replaced. It means checking whether the existing plan still reflects your circumstances and whether the different components still work together.

Florida attorney discussing probate and estate planning with a family

Frequently Asked Questions About Probate and Estate Planning in Florida


Does having a will avoid probate in Florida?

  • No. A will generally directs the distribution of probate assets, but it does not itself eliminate the probate process. Some assets may pass outside probate because of joint ownership, beneficiary designations, or a properly funded trust.

Does everything automatically go to my spouse if I die without a will?

  • No. Florida’s intestacy laws determine the surviving spouse’s share based on the family’s circumstances, including whether the decedent has descendants and whether those descendants are also descendants of the surviving spouse. Florida homestead rules can create additional restrictions.

Does Florida have an inheritance tax?

  • Florida does not currently impose a state inheritance tax on beneficiaries receiving an inheritance. Florida also does not currently impose a state estate tax on deaths occurring after December 31, 2004. Federal estate-tax rules are separate.

How much can someone leave before federal estate tax applies in 2026?

  • For a person who dies in 2026, the federal basic estate-tax exclusion is $15 million. Whether an estate has a federal filing or tax obligation depends on the applicable federal rules and the circumstances of the estate.

Does a trust eliminate probate?

  • A properly funded revocable trust can allow assets held by the trust to pass without the ordinary probate process. Assets that were never transferred to the trust may still require probate, and trust administration can still involve significant legal and financial responsibilities.

Do I need an estate plan if I do not have a lot of money?

  • An estate plan can still be useful even when an estate is relatively modest. Wills, beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, healthcare documents, and trusts can address different issues during incapacity and after death. The appropriate combination depends on the person’s circumstances.

Planning for Probate and Estate Administration in South Florida

Probate and estate planning involve more than deciding who should receive property.

The way assets are titled, the existence of beneficiary designations, family relationships, Florida homestead rules, debts, and the presence of a will or trust can all affect what happens after someone dies.

Reinfeld & Cabrera, P.A. assists clients with probate, estate planning, trusts, and related matters in Coral Springs, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, and throughout South Florida.

If you are reviewing an existing estate plan or dealing with the estate of someone who has died, an attorney can help identify which assets are subject to probate, what legal procedures apply, and whether the existing plan still reflects your intentions.